Tires BRIDGESTONE or Nokia

Filter

Part:

Tires
Back
  • loading...

Manufacturer:

All
Back
  • loading...

Make:

Select make
Back
  • loading...

Generation:

Select generation
  • Vectra
  • Mokka
  • Antara
  • Astra
  • SPORTS TOURER
  • Meriva
  • Zafira Tourer
Review tone
Reviews found: 0
BRIDGESTONE Tires
RipSlow3412
Rating 5.0
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:

Bridgestone Turanza EV tires. No foam and quieter than the OE on the car. Rides better too :)

Pros: quieter than OE, rides better
Cons: no foam
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

2016 EX-L V-6 MT coupe. I seem to swap later every year. Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 dropping width to 225.

With the amount of snow decreasing these tires will wear faster on dry pavement. But they are good in snow and 40° and below weather.

Pros: good in snow
Cons: wear faster on pavement
Part number: WS90
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Nokia Tires

We put them on our 2018 XT this year, studless. Been pretty good so far. The -30C we've been getting in Calgary lately though there's still some slip on the hard sheer ice but no way I'd want to try regular all seasons!

Pros: pretty good so far
Cons: some slip on ice
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Nokia Tires

I have the Ones on my 1997 Toyota Estima Emina and they're great. Nice steering response and like Nokian's other all-season tires, they do great in the wet. I also appreciate the aramid (kevlar) sidewalls.

Pros: nice steering response, great in wet
Vehicle: Toyota Estima
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I had a Mazda 6 that came fitted with Bridgestone Turanza. I got 4 years and 90,000km from those. I then fitted Potenza and got 2.5 years and 32,000km before they were gone.

Pros: long lasting Turanza
Cons: Potenza wore quickly
Vehicle: Mazda 6
Mileage: 32000 km
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Nokia Tires
christophersdad
Rating 2.0
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:

I had their entyre series, basically the all weather option. A bit too firm for my liking. After 20k miles, they became very noisy.

Cons: too firm, very noisy
Mileage: 32186 km
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
1 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 ... 162

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Comparisons
Show all

Activity feed

Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page

The brake caliper Akebono has only 10 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake pads Detroit Axle has only 8 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The ball joint OEM Volvo has only 2 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake discs Hella got the first review!

The brake pads APP got the first review!

The brake cylinder Metelli got the first review!

For tires OEM Toyota already 25 reviews.

In the rating best cabin filter already 13 brands participate!

In the rating best timing chain already 4 brands participate!

In the auto rating headlights for Volkswagen Golf already 5 brands participate!

In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!

In the auto rating brake pads for BMW M2 already 5 brands participate!

The battery MOPAR has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The leaf springs Dobinsons has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The manual transmission OEM FORD has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

In the rating best fuel pump already 5 brands participate!

In the rating best flywheel only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

The brake pads OEM Subaru already has 250 votes!

The battery OEM Toyota already has 100 votes!

The engine oil AMSOIL already has 1000 votes!

Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page

In the rating best CVT transmission only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page

Loading...