vs
Tires Laufenn or FULDA
I am using laufen s fit as on my 2023 MY dual.. it cost me 108usd per /tire got it at AMERICAS TIRE. I agree woth others on foam padding but i am least bothered bout it. Performace wise i see no difference in regular day to day driving. Infact have performed well in snow as well.. i am happy with it running almost 2k miles till now.
Pros: performed well in snow
Cons: foam padding bothered
Mileage: 3218 km
I've been running a set of the latter AS in the snow and they've been great for an AS considering the conditions.
Pros: great in snow, affordable quality
Check out Laufenn for tire options. They are Hankook’s economy line, and they are solid tires at an affordable price.
Pros: solid tires, affordable price
Laufenn is well regarded as a practical option.
Pros: well regarded, practical
America’s tire has Laufenn s fit all season tires with 45k mile warranty for ~$700 installed. Or kumho solus majesty 9s for ~$775.
Pros: 45k mile warranty
Laufenn S fit AS is not bad, it is a hankook company and usually 1/3 the price of Pirelli with very similar performance.
Pros: similar performance
Cons: not bad
Am avut 8 ani anvelope de iarna, 0 zapada, ba chiar 20g cu plus, dar am trecut la allseason si numai ninsoare si -5 grade prin Iasi.\n\nPe flescaraie la -5 grade am testat fara probleme \n\nPe zapada curata mers cu 20kmph fara probleme.\n\nPe zapada cu gheata dedesubt, 0 aderenta, doar drift.\n\nAnvelope Laufen 4Gfit
Pros: testat fara probleme
Cons: 0 aderenta pe zapada cu gheata
I just put on some Laufenn G Fit tires in August that I got for quietness but get poor wet weather ratings from *some* reviewers. I tested them in slop and could only activate ABS with a very hard stomp or traction control on a painted line.
Pros: quietness
Cons: poor wet weather ratings
Vehicle:
Honda Fit
Laufenn provides far less grip, especially when wet.
Cons: less grip, especially wet
Laufenn sam imao isto i hoce da proklizaju na ledu.
Cons: proklizaju na ledu
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.
Comparisons
Show all
Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page
The brake pads NIPPARTS got the first review!
The brake discs Hella got the first review!
The brake discs PILENGA got the first review!
For cabin filter Fram already 25 reviews.
For battery Energizer already 25 reviews.
For battery Deka already 50 reviews.
In the rating best shock absorbers already 13 brands participate!
In the rating best windshield already 14 brands participate!
In the rating best head gasket already 3 brands participate!
In the auto rating windshield for Subaru Outback already 5 brands participate!
In the auto rating headlights for Volkswagen Golf already 5 brands participate!
In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!
Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page
Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page
Which tires to choose — Laufenn or FULDA?
If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.
We compare tires across these categories:
- PR Score.
- Overall ranking.
- Vote balance.
- Average rating.
- Number of reviews.
- Feature ratings.
- Car owners’ choice.
Which tires are better — FULDA or Laufenn?
In March 2026 on PartReview, tires FULDA and Laufenn were roughly equal.
- Laufenn received a PR Score of 69 out of 100, and FULDA scored 82 points.
- Laufenn ranked 28 in the overall ranking, and FULDA ranked 43.
- The average rating is higher for FULDA (3.9) than for Laufenn (3.6).
-
Tires FULDA have better feature ratings than Laufenn:
- Grip - owners believe, that this property for FULDA is better than Laufenn.
- Ride comfort - drivers claim, that this property for FULDA is outperforms Laufenn.
- Noise - reviews suggest, that this property for Laufenn is preferred to FULDA.
Which tires are more popular — Laufenn or FULDA?
In March 2026 on PartReview, tires Laufenn were overall more popular than FULDA.
By vote balance, tires Laufenn surpassed FULDA:
- For Laufenn, the ratio of positive (195) to negative (84) votes is 111 votes.
- For FULDA, the ratio of positive (34) to negative (7) votes is 27 votes.
By number of reviews, tires Laufenn surpassed FULDA:
- For tires Laufenn there are 86 reviews: 51 positive, 21 neutral, 14 negative.
- For tires FULDA there are 13 reviews: 10 positive, 2 neutral, 1 negative.
Which tires do car owners prefer — Laufenn or FULDA?
In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires Laufenn and FULDA have not taken top places in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding your review about these manufacturers.
Other comparisons of tires
If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.
For example, comparisons of tires Laufenn with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.
Also available: comparisons of tires FULDA with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.
You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.