vs
Tires OEM Audi or MRF
Find an MRF FASST service centre if you have around you.
Go there and and get this replaced, they will provide a newly manufactured same tire, and will charge you for tire depriciation of the old one.
Pros: newly manufactured tyre
Cons: tire depriciation charge
Vehicle:
Ford Freestyle
Mileage: 10000 km
Had the same exact thing at 1 year with MRF Tyre, went to MRF and claimed warranty, they replaced with a new one and took the old one based on tyre tread left and condition. I paid only 2k for a 17 inch tyre.
Pros: warranty replaced tyre
Cons: tyre tread condition
Hab im letzten Jahr meinen 91er Audi 100 C4 mit 120tkm wieder fit gemacht, den ich 2007 weg gestellt hatte. Wären also knapp 18 Jahre.
Vorbereitungen:
- Alte Reifen drauf, die sind danach eh hin.
Vehicle:
Audi 100
Mileage: 120000 km
Only I know how I managed to use these tyres for 17000 kms. Got the rear tyre changed with MRF RevZ radials as soon as the tyre wore out and it’s been a huge difference. Leaning on corners has also become way easier now.
Pros: huge difference, easier leaning
Mileage: 17000 km
Last week I got a flat tyre on my back from the office and found that this tyre on my 2-month-old Suzuki Fronx (Aug 2025 model) is no more usable. Found a chipped off thread grip on the driver's side tyre, which resulted in low pressure. Due to driving at that pressure, the side liner developed cracks, losing its pressure holding capacity. Commonly, it is a clear case of prolonged low-pressure driving. However, in my case, since the tyre always looked low on pressure, I made sure to check the tyre pressure at every gas station while refueling. Now I am running on a spare tyre and wondering if I should go for the same tyre (MRF Wanderer 195/60 R16) or another brand.
Pros: tyre looked low on pressure
Cons: chipped off thread grip, side liner cracks
Vehicle:
Suzuki
I have the MRF Markus on my car; they are overall a great tire, but the road conditions, especially after monsoon, are absolute shit, and these low-profile EV tires struggle a bit.
Pros: great tire overall
Cons: struggle on bad roads
I burst my Elevate tyre due to my mistake (side wall damage), only 3k KMs on the odometer. MRF rejected the claim but Honda provided new tyre for free as a part of goodwill warranty.
Cons: tire burst, warranty rejected
Vehicle:
Honda
Mileage: 3000 km
Same happened with my mrf ecotred just after 15000 km...got no claim... changed all 4 tyres to bridgestone coz safety is primary
Cons: tire defect, no warranty claim, safety concern
Mileage: 15000 km
My Amaze 2nd gen had same issue , MRF ZVTV was tyre , go to MRF tyres and they will get it changed under warranty
Cons: tire defect, warranty claim
Vehicle:
Honda
Same issue with my Skoda Rapid. Got it replaced immediately at Ekkatuthangal MRF on a pro rata basis.
Cons: tire defect, pro rata replacement
Vehicle:
Skoda Rapid
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.
Comparisons
Show all
Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page
The brake pads NIPPARTS got the first review!
The brake discs Hella got the first review!
The brake discs OEM Suzuki got the first review!
For tires OEM Toyota already 25 reviews.
For tires IRONMAN already 25 reviews.
For starter motor OEM Volkswagen already 25 reviews.
In the rating best ignition coil already 13 brands participate!
In the rating best fuel pump already 5 brands participate!
In the rating best turbocharger already 4 brands participate!
In the auto rating headlights for Volkswagen Golf already 5 brands participate!
In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!
In the auto rating brake pads for BMW M2 already 5 brands participate!
Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page
Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page
