vs
Tires PHANTOM or Triangle
Imk kinus ir nesuk galvos. Pats su 330i su triangle kazkokiais važiavau, buvo labai gerai, geriau nei su naudotais nokianais. Kabliukas tame, kad antrą žiemą kur kas prasčiau kibo, trečią visai akmeninės. Tai kinus perki vieniem metam.
Pros: labai gerai, geriau nei
Cons: antra žiemą prasčiau kibo
Vehicle:
BMW
I have driven a lot on Triangle winter tyres at work for 2 years. They were as good or better than the Continental and Nokian tyres from the years before.
Pros: good performance, comparable to premium brands
Ive used triangle snow tires with good results.
Pros: good results
Triangles used to be fucking terrible desth traps but ive got a set on a car that i drive very hard at times and they seem to hold up mint these days even in the wet
Pros: hold up mint these days
Cons: used to be terrible
Sure, for about 12k miles.
Pros: last 12k miles
Mileage: 19312 km
Some tires are made in China and some possibly(?) better ones are made Vietnam, while made in Korea tires usually aren't bad, but may not last as long as expensive tires. For safety, I wouldn't go too cheap on tires. Many cheap tires have rather poor traction when new and become unsafe with only a few miles of wear on them. The Chinese tires often are made of very hard rubber, which might wear well, but has poor traction. There may be some in between tires made in the Philippines, but I'd avoid them. Kumho is a Korean tire company with majority Chinese ownership by a Chinese tire company. They make Phantom tires, likely in China, but even in Korea, they would be the low end. Hankook tires are "better" Korean tires. Not the best, but seem safer. I'd check tire reviews on the Internet.
Pros: may wear well (hard rubber)
Cons: poor traction, not safe, avoid cheap
They’re good for me since my car has camber and will just destroy the tires anyways
Pros: good for camber wear
They're Chinese junk. They sorta work, but have 20% less traction and 50% less lifetime.
Pros: sorta work
Cons: less traction, less lifetime
Poteva andare peggio: potevi aver preso delle Triangle AdvanteX TC101...
Triangle tires tend to be very bumpy at low speeds.
Cons: bumpy at low speeds
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.
Comparisons
Show all
Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page
The brake pads OEM Alfa Romeo got the first review!
The brake caliper OEM BMW got the first review!
The brake pads OEM Infiniti got the first review!
For wiper blades PIAA already 100 reviews.
For battery Energizer already 25 reviews.
In the rating best water pump already 12 brands participate!
In the rating best timing belt already 13 brands participate!
In the rating best head gasket already 3 brands participate!
In the auto rating oil filter for Volkswagen Passat already 5 brands participate!
In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!
In the auto rating tires for Subaru Outback already 50 brands participate!
For cabin filter Fram already 25 reviews.
Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page
Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page
Which tires to choose — PHANTOM or Triangle?
If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.
We compare tires across these categories:
- PR Score.
- Overall ranking.
- Vote balance.
- Average rating.
- Number of reviews.
- Feature ratings.
- Car owners’ choice.
Which tires are better — Triangle or PHANTOM?
In March 2026 on PartReview, tires Triangle were overall better than PHANTOM.
- PHANTOM received a PR Score of 46 out of 100, and Triangle scored 59 points.
- PHANTOM ranked 58 in the overall ranking, and Triangle ranked 51.
- The average rating is higher for Triangle (3.1) than for PHANTOM (2.9).
-
Tires Triangle have better feature ratings than PHANTOM:
- Grip - owners believe, that this property for Triangle is better than PHANTOM.
- Ride comfort - drivers claim, that this property for PHANTOM is outperforms Triangle.
- Noise - reviews suggest, that this property for PHANTOM is preferred to Triangle.
Which tires are more popular — PHANTOM or Triangle?
Tires PHANTOM and Triangle were equally popular according to data in March 2026.
By vote balance, tires Triangle surpassed PHANTOM:
- For PHANTOM, the ratio of positive (20) to negative (23) votes is -3 votes.
- For Triangle, the ratio of positive (19) to negative (13) votes is 6 votes.
By number of reviews, tires PHANTOM surpassed Triangle:
- For tires PHANTOM there are 12 reviews: 2 positive, 7 neutral, 3 negative.
- For tires Triangle there are 10 reviews: 5 positive, 2 neutral, 3 negative.
Which tires do car owners prefer — PHANTOM or Triangle?
In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires PHANTOM and Triangle have not taken top places in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding your review about these manufacturers.
Other comparisons of tires
If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.
For example, comparisons of tires PHANTOM with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.
Also available: comparisons of tires Triangle with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.
You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.