vs
Tires TIGAR or MRF
10 godina stare tigrice i gde sam krenuo tu sam stigao kao da je suvo ????
Pros: stigao kao da suvo
Imam neke tigar zimske gume i sjajno me sluze.
Pros: sjajno me sluze
Tigar nove zimske, dobro gaze.
Pros: dobro gaze
We had a similar situation with kia ev. The left front tyre at night got punctured (sharp cut, we suspect it was due to impact of the pothole) due to a massive pothole in National highway that was invisible at night. The tyre went flat in 5 seconds.
Vehicle:
Kia
Mileage: 10000 km
Last week I got a flat tyre on my back from the office and found that this tyre on my 2-month-old Suzuki Fronx (Aug 2025 model) is no more usable. Found a chipped off thread grip on the driver's side tyre, which resulted in low pressure. Due to driving at that pressure, the side liner developed cracks, losing its pressure holding capacity. Commonly, it is a clear case of prolonged low-pressure driving. However, in my case, since the tyre always looked low on pressure, I made sure to check the tyre pressure at every gas station while refueling. Now I am running on a spare tyre and wondering if I should go for the same tyre (MRF Wanderer 195/60 R16) or another brand.
Pros: tyre looked low on pressure
Cons: chipped off thread grip, side liner cracks
Vehicle:
Suzuki
In comparison to the michelin tires, the tigar tires were extremely hard and already some kind of shiny even though they were much younger, had fewer miles/km and were never parked in brutal heat or sun. We bought 4 new tires anyways, so it didnt really matter to us, but that experience was enough for me to never buy a tigar tire.
Cons: extremely hard, kind of shiny
My MRF tyre bursted too in rain on a pothole about the height of 10 cm. MRF Quality is dogshit
Cons: dogshit quality
Vehicle:
Suzuki
I'll steer clear of mrf. You have much better options out there. Their wet grip is horrible
Pros: better options out there
Cons: wet grip is horrible
MRF is worst had same issue. They have lot's and lots of criteria my tyre had tread but still got rejected saying tyre had puncture. So can't replace it.
Cons: worst quality, warranty rejected
I burst my Elevate tyre due to my mistake (side wall damage), only 3k KMs on the odometer. MRF rejected the claim but Honda provided new tyre for free as a part of goodwill warranty.
Cons: tire burst, warranty rejected
Vehicle:
Honda
Mileage: 3000 km
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.
Comparisons
Show all
Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page
The brake pads OEM Alfa Romeo got the first review!
The brake caliper OEM BMW got the first review!
The brake pads OEM Infiniti got the first review!
For wiper blades PIAA already 100 reviews.
For battery Energizer already 25 reviews.
In the rating best water pump already 12 brands participate!
In the rating best timing belt already 13 brands participate!
In the rating best head gasket already 3 brands participate!
In the auto rating oil filter for Volkswagen Passat already 5 brands participate!
In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!
In the auto rating tires for Subaru Outback already 50 brands participate!
For cabin filter Fram already 25 reviews.
Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page
Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page
Which tires to choose — TIGAR or MRF?
If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.
We compare tires across these categories:
- PR Score.
- Overall ranking.
- Vote balance.
- Average rating.
- Number of reviews.
- Feature ratings.
- Car owners’ choice.
Which tires are better — MRF or TIGAR?
In March 2026 on PartReview, tires TIGAR were overall better than MRF.
- TIGAR received a PR Score of 65 out of 100, and MRF scored 49 points.
- TIGAR ranked 52 in the overall ranking, and MRF ranked 66.
- The average rating is higher for TIGAR (3.3) than for MRF (2.7).
-
Tires TIGAR have better feature ratings than MRF:
- Grip - owners believe, that this property for TIGAR is better than MRF.
- Ride comfort - drivers claim, that this property for MRF is outperforms TIGAR.
- Noise - reviews suggest, that this property for MRF is preferred to TIGAR.
Which tires are more popular — TIGAR or MRF?
Tires TIGAR and MRF were equally popular according to data in March 2026.
By vote balance, tires TIGAR surpassed MRF:
- For TIGAR, the ratio of positive (32) to negative (17) votes is 15 votes.
- For MRF, the ratio of positive (82) to negative (85) votes is -3 votes.
By number of reviews, tires MRF surpassed TIGAR:
- For tires TIGAR there are 16 reviews: 10 positive, 1 neutral, 5 negative.
- For tires MRF there are 53 reviews: 22 positive, 8 neutral, 23 negative.
Which tires do car owners prefer — TIGAR or MRF?
In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires TIGAR and MRF have not taken top places in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding your review about these manufacturers.
Other comparisons of tires
If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.
For example, comparisons of tires TIGAR with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.
Also available: comparisons of tires MRF with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.
You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.