Brake pads Textar or OEM Mazda

Filter

Part:

Brake pads
Back
  • loading...

Manufacturer:

All
Back
  • loading...

Make:

Select make
Back
  • loading...

Generation:

Select generation
  • Vectra
  • Mokka
  • Antara
  • Astra
  • SPORTS TOURER
  • Meriva
  • Zafira Tourer
Review tone
Reviews found: 0
Textar Brake pads
TechnoPenguin_
Rating 4.0
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
  • Dust:

I am happy with Textar pads, no noticeable squealing, but they do make the wheels dusty fairly quickly. Previous pads were Pagid and they were just horrible, squealing, no brakes when cold, etc.

Pros: no squealing, quiet operation
Cons: dusty wheels
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Textar Brake pads
Donseli
Rating 5.0
  • Braking:

I got Zimmerman rotors and Textar brake pads for my 2013 550i with the M package. Everything is been working great for the last 6 months.

Pros: working great
Vehicle: BMW
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
OEM Mazda Brake pads

So far I've spent 400€ on brakes, 100€ new battery, 1200€ on axles and other components related to them and maybe 150€ on oil and filters (2 oil changes so far)

Pros: safe and working
Vehicle: Mazda 6
Mileage: 216000 km
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Textar Brake pads

At the shop I run, we use textar pads on Zimmerman rotors. For some reason textar on textar always make noise on BMWs ( we elevated our complaints all the way to Textar, and they sent a rep to finally shrug). Pagid pads are ok, but I find they wear out more quickly.

Pros: reliable, rarely complaints
Cons: noise, wear quickly
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Textar Brake pads
Butcher
Rating 5.0
  • Braking:
  • Noise:

My go to brake pad is Textar. Why? Less problems. Since I own a shop, any warranty issue is wasted time. I will not charge a client to make it right. I do not have time to do the job a second time.

Pros: less problems
Cons: warranty issue is wasted time
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Textar Brake pads
adam_e30
Rating 4.0
  • Braking:

I replaced my front brakes recently with Textar pads and new Zimmerman rotors (non-PP brakes). Overall I am happy with them; I think they have a little more cold bite than the original pads do but are very similar to the stock pad compound. Original pads left deep grooves/ridges in the rotor around 55k miles. I don't track/autocross the car and I'm pretty easy on brakes. I also prefer and good cold bite which you don't always get with a ceramic pad.

Pros: good cold bite, similar to stock
Cons: original pads left grooves
Mileage: 55000 km
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Textar Brake pads
IAmSoWinning
Rating 3.5
  • Braking:
  • Noise:

My factory textar pads would do this after a rain, or whenever it was humid out after about 50000 miles. I replaced them with some hawk hps pads and zimmerman rotors, no more squeak now! Although I am not in love with the Hawk HPS pads, a lot of people recommend them, and while I do agree they bite pretty good when they've got some heat in them, the cold bite is actually pretty bad for a "street" pad.

Pros: no more squeak
Cons: bad cold bite
Mileage: 50000 km
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Textar Brake pads
Mhrok
Rating 3.5
  • Braking:

I have good experience with Textar pads, both epad and normal ones. Currently I have ATE rotors, but they had to be resurfaced because of warping, so no recommendation from me

Pros: good experience with Textar pads
Cons: ATE rotors warped
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
OEM Mazda Brake pads
theteg
Rating 2.0
  • Braking:
  • Dust:

easy 40 minute job to replace brakes on my 14 Mazda 3 took about two hours. It all pops off super easy going great. Go to put them on, well shit they don't fit. Try the other side for some reason thinking I'm just having a stupid moment. Doesn't work either.

Pros: easy to remove
Cons: brakes don't fit
Vehicle: Mazda 3
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
OEM Mazda Brake pads

Just had a dealer give me an estimate of $560 for new rear pads and rotors. Unfortunately, the idiot was going by mileage and he never actually looked to see that I just replaced the pads and rotors myself 10,000 miles ago. That was on my 2016 Mazda CX 5.

Pros: null
Cons: overpriced, unnecessary
Vehicle: Mazda 5
Mileage: 10000 km
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Comparisons
Show all

Activity feed

Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page

The brake discs WAGNER has only 5 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake pads NIPPARTS got the first review!

The brake discs Hella got the first review!

The brake discs Hella Pagid has only 4 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake caliper Raybestos has only 9 reviews. Maybe add one more?

For tires OEM Toyota already 25 reviews.

For tires IRONMAN already 25 reviews.

In the rating best ignition coil already 13 brands participate!

In the rating best fuel pump already 5 brands participate!

In the rating best turbocharger already 4 brands participate!

In the auto rating headlights for Volkswagen Golf already 5 brands participate!

In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!

In the auto rating brake pads for BMW M2 already 5 brands participate!

The manual transmission OEM FORD has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The brake discs Tesla has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The tie rods 555 has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The engine oil AMSOIL already has 1000 votes!

The brake pads OEM Subaru already has 250 votes!

In the rating best flywheel only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page

The engine radiator MISHIMOTO already has 300 votes!

Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page

In the rating best CVT transmission only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

Loading...