Brake pads Textar or Project Mu
Consider Project Mu Club Racers. They’re not the most aggressive pads but hold up decently well on track depending on your pace and are surprisingly streetable.
I did them myself for $600, Textar pads and Zimmerman rotors.
Pretty happy with my PMU 999s. They’re a step down from csgs but so much cheaper even with tariffs on imports.
IMO the best are Project MU-HC+. in my Megane RS I could treat the HC+ as a track pad and go all-out for a full session, they'd just wear pretty fast at high temps
The pads seem to last forever on the street, and work really well on the track/ when warm
Textar
Textar makes good pads but they get brake dust everywhere. They are currently the stock ones on my 23 m40i.
Around 12k miles, the anti-rattle decal on the left front Textar pads melted and which made them rattle in the caliper over bumps. FCP Euro exchanged them for Pagid pads and no problem since. Rear Textar pads have been fine.
Well, I just put Textar pads on and am looking to swap them because they\u2019re super dusty and squeal with light pressure, so I too would love some recommendations.
I recently replaced some on a 981 with Textar and don’t recommend it. So much dust and some noise at low speed braking.
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.
Which brake pads to choose — Textar or Project Mu?
If choosing brake pads across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.
We compare brake pads across these categories:
- PR Score.
- Overall ranking.
- Vote balance.
- Average rating.
- Number of reviews.
- Feature ratings.
- Car owners’ choice.
Which brake pads are better — Project Mu or Textar?
In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads Project Mu were overall better than Textar.
- Textar received a PR Score of 74 out of 100, and Project Mu scored 94 points.
- Textar ranked 22 in the overall ranking, and Project Mu ranked 21.
- The average rating is higher for Project Mu (4.2) than for Textar (3.8).
-
Brake pads Project Mu have better feature ratings than Textar:
- Dust - owners believe, that this property for Project Mu is better than Textar.
- Braking - drivers claim, that this property for Project Mu is outperforms Textar.
- Noise - reviews suggest, that this property for Project Mu is preferred to Textar.
Which brake pads are more popular — Textar or Project Mu?
In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads Textar were overall more popular than Project Mu.
By vote balance, brake pads Textar surpassed Project Mu:
- For Textar, the ratio of positive (104) to negative (35) votes is 69 votes.
- For Project Mu, the ratio of positive (64) to negative (4) votes is 60 votes.
By number of reviews, brake pads Textar surpassed Project Mu:
- For brake pads Textar there are 44 reviews: 30 positive, 7 neutral, 7 negative.
- For brake pads Project Mu there are 22 reviews: 20 positive, 2 neutral, 0 negative.
Which brake pads do car owners prefer — Textar or Project Mu?
In March 2026, according to PartReview, brake pads Project Mu led more car-specific ratings than Textar:
Project Mu are chosen by owners of cars such as: Renault Megane, and others.
Brake pads Textar have not yet taken leading positions in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding a review and specifying your car.
Other comparisons of brake pads
If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.
For example, comparisons of brake pads Textar with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Carbotech.
Also available: comparisons of brake pads Project Mu with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Carbotech.
You can also see who is better among other brake pads manufacturers: EBC or POWER STOP, EBC or Akebono, EBC or Hawk Performance, Brembo or EBC, Akebono or POWER STOP.