Clutch kit Luk or Sachs

Filter

Part:

Clutch kit
Back
  • loading...

Manufacturer:

All
Back
  • loading...

Make:

Select make
Back
  • loading...

Generation:

Select generation
  • Vectra
  • Mokka
  • Antara
  • Astra
  • SPORTS TOURER
  • Meriva
  • Zafira Tourer
Review tone
Reviews found: 0
Sachs Clutch kit
Standard-Country8407
Rating 5.0
  • Slip:
  • Engagement smoothness:

Sachs 764 Pressure Plate & Sachs 098 Friction Disc paired with a DMFW is what is colloquially referred to as the Sachs 2.5 "kit". ( it's not an actual "kit" but it's a time honored upgrade for 550+ hp Porsche 996 TT.

I've run stock Sachs also with an unsprung GT2 disc. But my car at 550/575 whp likes this setup ^.

I'm on my 3rd clutch = 17+ years.

Pros: time honored upgrade, handles high HP
Vehicle: Porsche
Part number: 764, 098
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Luk Clutch kit
ChucklesC89
Rating 4.0
  • Engagement smoothness:

Transmission itself is great. Could be other things as mentioned here but common issue outside actuators/TCM would be the clutch in the bell housing. Recommend when accelerating from a stop to go heavier on the gas so it engages more hard. Could prob dive it like that for a few years but eventually will gunk up with enough dust inside that the actuators won’t be able to move the forks. Most shops will charge $3,500+ to replace. If you’re good with DIY you can prob do the job when the time comes yourself for about $750 for the Luk repset and dual clutch trans fluid.

Pros: transmission is great
Cons: clutch gunk up with dust
Vehicle: Ford Focus
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Sachs Clutch kit

Got a suggestion from one of the local service technicians, to go for SACHS brand clutch kit.

Vehicle: Volkswagen Polo
Mileage: 108500 km
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Luk Clutch kit
Mario8000
Rating 5.0
  • Engagement smoothness:

Wouldn’t trust anything but the luk kit at this point. Ur talking maybe $100 difference for something that might be fine be something proven to be oem quality.

Pros: oem quality, proven
Cons: maybe $100 difference
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Luk Clutch kit

So, if you just take that flywheel to a machine shop to scuff it up, lathe it down to have a perfect fresh surface, you can just put a new LuK or Sachs clutch kit on it.

Pros: nice and quiet
Cons: makes a horrific racket
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Sachs Clutch kit

If your clutch has been slipping for a few months, it seems likely your flywheel may have some hot spots, and needs resurfaced at a minimum, in addition to a new clutch, pilot bushing, and throwout bearing.

Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Sachs Clutch kit
RJCA-Burgt
Rating 5.0
  • Slip:
  • Engagement smoothness:

If stock or mild performance gains, take the m20 flywheel and a stock m20 sachs clutch kit (bmw always sachs) and it will hold up very easily. They can hold way more torque than they are advertised for and last forever if not clutchkicked to hell.

Pros: holds easily, holds more torque, lasts long
Vehicle: BMW
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Luk Clutch kit

I had a clutch kit (LUK) put in my 1998 Ranger 2WD back in March 2025. Approximately 10,000 miles ago. Had issues with it recently and took it back to shop. Shop called today and said clutch kit is warrantied but not labor.

Vehicle: Ford Ranger
Mileage: 16093 km
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
Sachs Clutch kit

Sorry to burst this bubble, that I was hoping to benefit from, but I ordered from Rock Auto, it arrived today, and the Sachs kit is no longer an FCC friction disk with caged springs. The springs are no longer caged like OEM. The pressure plate also, although it looks similar is also not marked as FCC, both are just marked with weird Sachs part numbers that don't co-relate with any searches that I have done, but they do match the numbers on the outside of the Sachs box it shipped in. Both bearings are still marked as Nachi and Japan. The Sachs box says made in Japan on the outside, but the design of the friction disc is different and there is no FCC branding on either the disk or the plate. I'm not sure how much I missed this deal by, but I was gutted to find out this is no longer the deal that it was. Returning it tomorrow.

Cons: springs not caged, no FCC branding, different design, not OEM equivalent
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 12

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Comparisons
Show all

Activity feed

Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page

The brake caliper ATE has only 9 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The ball joint OEM Volvo has only 2 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake caliper Raybestos has only 9 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The tires OEM Fiat got the first review!

The ABS unit OEM FORD got the first review!

For tires GISLAVED already 25 reviews.

In the rating best cabin filter already 13 brands participate!

In the rating best shock absorbers already 13 brands participate!

In the rating best fuel pump already 5 brands participate!

In the rating best CVT transmission only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

In the rating best flywheel only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

In the auto rating shock absorbers for Ford Ranger already 20 brands participate!

In the auto rating headlights for Volkswagen Golf already 5 brands participate!

In the auto rating tires for Toyota Corolla already 50 brands participate!

The leaf springs Dobinsons has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The manual transmission OEM FORD has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The control arm OEM Toyota has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The brake pads OEM Subaru already has 250 votes!

The engine radiator MISHIMOTO already has 300 votes!

For cabin filter Fram already 25 reviews.

The tires OEM FORD already has 100 votes!

Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page

Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page

Loading...