Tires MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE

Filter

Part:

Tires
Back
  • loading...

Manufacturer:

All
Back
  • loading...

Make:

Select make
Back
  • loading...

Generation:

Select generation
  • Vectra
  • Mokka
  • Antara
  • Astra
  • SPORTS TOURER
  • Meriva
  • Zafira Tourer
Review tone
Reviews found: 0
MICHELIN Tires

X-Ice for me. A few reviews noted they did a bit better in slush, water, etc vs just deep snow so they make sense where I live.

Pros: better in slush, water
Cons: vs deep snow
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
MICHELIN Tires

our 2016 didn't come with falken, but whatever similar brand it had were awful and I happily replaced them at 20-25k miles with a set of michelin a/s 3+, which have been much better.

Pros: much better
Cons: were awful
Mileage: 25000 km
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
MICHELIN Tires

I had the Cross Climates on my last car. They were mounted Feb 2021. The Cross Climates came out in 2015 as a summer tire with winter capabilities. They were pretty good. I liked how they handled when I went through a huge deep long puddle/water build up on the highway. My car wasnt pulled to the left if the water was on the left for example. They handled pretty decently in the snow. While driving over slush or ice on the highway I felt the car was secure and planted. Although I did feel some slipping at times but recovered because of their grip right away. I think they handled better than the Michelin Sport All season tires I had on my BMW. As for summer handling I thought they were great. They did feel a bit slower or clunky going into fast corners but they gripped well.

Pros: good in snow, great summer handling
Cons: clunky in fast corners
Vehicle: BMW
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
t44tq
Rating 3.5
  • Grip:

The Bridgestone RE780 AS is another excellent tire- I'd say it's nearly as good as the Michelin, definitely better than the BFG. Where it falls down is cost- it's about the same price as the Michelin PS A/S line of all seasons and does not have the same performance. Great in the dry, great in the wet- the dry grip is not as good as the Michelin.

Pros: excellent, great in dry, great in wet
Cons: high cost, dry grip not as good as Michelin
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Comparisons
Show all

Activity feed

Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page

The brake caliper Akebono has only 10 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake pads Detroit Axle has only 8 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The ball joint OEM Volvo has only 2 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake discs Hella got the first review!

The brake pads APP got the first review!

The brake cylinder Metelli got the first review!

For tires OEM Toyota already 25 reviews.

In the rating best cabin filter already 13 brands participate!

In the rating best timing chain already 4 brands participate!

In the auto rating headlights for Volkswagen Golf already 5 brands participate!

In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!

In the auto rating brake pads for BMW M2 already 5 brands participate!

The battery MOPAR has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The leaf springs Dobinsons has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The manual transmission OEM FORD has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

In the rating best fuel pump already 5 brands participate!

In the rating best flywheel only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

The brake pads OEM Subaru already has 250 votes!

The battery OEM Toyota already has 100 votes!

The engine oil AMSOIL already has 1000 votes!

Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page

In the rating best CVT transmission only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page

Loading...