Tires MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE

Filter

Part:

Tires
Back
  • loading...

Manufacturer:

All
Back
  • loading...

Make:

Select make
Back
  • loading...

Generation:

Select generation
  • Vectra
  • Mokka
  • Antara
  • Astra
  • SPORTS TOURER
  • Meriva
  • Zafira Tourer
Review tone
Reviews found: 0
MICHELIN Tires
the4ner
Rating 4.5
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:

For all seasons, get Michelin pilot a/s 3+. Way better than the Conti extremecontacts I had before. Probably not quite as good in the snow but who cares. So smooth, relatively quiet, and great grip for an all season.

Pros: smooth, relatively quiet
Cons: not great in snow
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
MICHELIN Tires

Michelins, Contis and Bridgestones are all top end tires its hard to go wrong with for most buyers in my experience, but you're paying for that value.

Pros: top end tires
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
MICHELIN Tires
GLI Dan
Rating 4.5
  • Grip:
  • Noise:

I had just come from the old Good year Eagle F1 GSD3's which were fantastic if a little soft on the sidewalls. The General's gave me decent tread life and grip. They weren't nearly as good in the wet as the F1's but I'm not sure my current PSS's are even as good as those F1's were; they were simply magic in the wet. My biggest complaint was the noise, just a very loud tire. I've had falken 512's and hated them. I knew how good the PSS's were but they were going to run about $1100 for the set. I ended up spending the extra because of the mileage guarantee. They guarantee 30k miles, which I have never seen out of a set of tires, and pro-rate replacements for any mileage under 30k. On my E46 that equated to me getting BOGO PSS's. The money upfront more than paid for itself in the long run; plus there are no tires on the market that do everything the PSS does as well as the PSS does.

Pros: fantastic wet grip, mileage guarantee
Cons: soft sidewalls, very loud
Vehicle: BMW
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
danny_16v
Rating 4.5
  • Grip:
  • Noise:

Conti DW is a good tire. A bit soft of a sidewall so some vague response. Bridgestone Potenza s04 pole position is better. Better response. Good in wet and good life. Closest to a Michelin Pilot super sport you'll get. Tire Rack rated it a close 2nd if I remember right. I have had both on my M3. I'd get the Bridgestone again, have them now.

Pros: better response, good in wet, good life
Vehicle: BMW
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
alex_plex
Rating 4.0
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:

Bought new tires - Bridgestone Potenza RE002 205/50R16. Yeah, it is not stance size, but I'm very bored of driving my static low Corrado with low profile tyres, and would like to enjoy the driving R36 engine without slow down before every pit

Pros: new tires
Cons: not stance size
Part number: RE002
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
MICHELIN Tires
Portlandrainaway
Rating 5.0
  • Grip:
  • Noise:

Got some Michelin MXV4 for a really good price last year and they really helped with the absolute worst winter storm we've had here in portland in almost 2 decades. Did well in light snow, and extremely well in rain, plus they're incredibly quiet on the roads.

Pros: well in light snow
Cons: worst winter storm
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
MICHELIN Tires
dmc
Rating 3.0
  • Noise:

There were long sections of I-90 especially through Washington that were loud as f***. I don’t know if it’s damage due to chains or what, but I had to endure hours of this nonsense. Maybe it was my tires? They are Michelin Pilot Super Sports in 235/40R18 inflated up to 39 psi for the extra load. They’re silent on most other roads though.

Pros: silent on most roads
Cons: loud on some roads
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

A friend of mine put a set of those on her Mazda5, in 16\". While I didn't find any issues with it not tracking straight, they did wear quickly, and yet somehow had very little traction. I'm talking \"light them up the whole way through an intersection in a stock Mazda5\" levels of non-grip. Garbage tires.

Cons: wear quickly, little traction
Vehicle: Mazda
Is this review helpful?
Comment
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Comparisons
Show all

Activity feed

Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page

The brake caliper ATE has only 9 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake fluid OEM Subaru has only 2 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake discs OEM Subaru has only 8 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake discs FEBI got the first review!

In the rating best shock absorbers already 13 brands participate!

In the rating best fuel pump already 5 brands participate!

In the rating best windshield already 14 brands participate!

In the rating best flywheel only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

In the auto rating oil filter for Volkswagen Passat already 5 brands participate!

In the auto rating battery for Volkswagen Golf already 5 brands participate!

In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!

The roof rack YAKIMA has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The brake pads G-brake has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The piston rings OEM Honda has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The engine radiator MISHIMOTO already has 300 votes!

The engine oil AMSOIL already has 1000 votes!

For tires GISLAVED already 25 reviews.

The tires OEM FORD already has 100 votes!

Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page

Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page

In the rating best CVT transmission only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

Loading...