Bought Toyo Celsius 2 and they are amazing. Quiet, handles well on snow and 60,000 miles.
Pros: quiet, handles well
Mileage: 96560 km
Owner reviews for tires
Manufacturers
Comparisons
I have had Laufenn G Fit on my Honda Fit since this summer. They're Hankooks and fantastic. I wanted a low noise grand touring tire and these had pretty good reviews and I got them for about 85 bucks each a corner on sale and thought, this is a Pimp My Ride moment that I cannot give up. I mean I heard you liked Fits yo so I got you four G Fits for your Fit.
This Honda is a noisy car compared to most other modern cars and the previous Sumitomos roared with half the tread left. These new guys just sort of hum quietly and calmly and sometimes I don't even hear them on really good pavement. They are night and day better as far as comfort and noise.
The highway feel is amazing, they track really well and took away any squirliness of the car which it inherently has because it's rather lightweight. It feels like you're driving a little train, but it easily switches lanes when you need to. I don't feel like I need to correct as much when I'm at speed.
Criticisms you'll find online have to do with wet weather grip which I took pretty seriously by going out to some empty roads and trying to peel out and slide in a torrential downpour. I couldn't find any fault with them compared to the older tires.
Of course they might not be the right tires on something else like a big old German touring sedan. But on this 2500 lb Honda they are comically good for the price.
I like them so much I'm thinking about getting some for my CRV as well. I like them better than the Michelin Defender that were on a car that I just sold. Of course, I think the Michelin probably has longer tread wear, but as far as the driving feel these cheap tires are amazing.
Just a reminder, I'm talking about the G version and not the X or I think they make an s version too. But I assume they all have similar carcasses and compounds.
Pros: fantastic, low noise, amazing highway feel
Cons: wet weather grip
Vehicle:
Honda Fit
Just got CC2s for my 23 CRV and the performance is night and day from the OEM tires! We've had a weird stretch of snow in MN lately and they've been as good as advertised!
Pros: performance is night and day
Vehicle:
Honda
I just went with the Pirelli Weatheractive's cause I heard they were a little quieter and slightly more efficient. They seem to be great so far.
Pros: quieter, more efficient
I have been through a set and yes they are worth the money. They are great all weather tires but I will say this when it comes to deeper snow and ice you won't beat a dedicated snow tire like Blizzaks. I ran my Cross CLimates 2s on my pruis year round and did great with them.
Pros: great all weather tires
Cons: worse than snow tires
Vehicle:
Toyota Prius
Laufenn, I currently have those tires for my truck. Had them for 2 years so far and still plenty of tread left. Was also looking for a decent all weather tire and found this. Highly recommend.
Pros: plenty of tread left, decent tire
Have driven Sailuns 4Seasons on a rental Model 3 for 3 days last winter. Didn't encounter snow or ice but heavy rain, where the tires didn't feel comfortable up to the same speeds I am accustomed with Michelin summers or Bridgestone winters. Outside that they seemed ok.
Pros: seemed ok otherwise
Cons: uncomfortable in heavy rain
I always ran Nitto NT555 gen 1 and gen 2 on my LS430. Pretty light stretch, especially the gen 2’s as they run wider. Been running these sizes and wheels for 12 years.
Pros: long-term use
Cons: light stretch, gen 2 run wider
Vehicle:
Lexus
Tires (Kumho Ecsta LX Platinum) were installed 6/25/2024 @ 151,xxx miles (with receipts). Manufactured date is May 2023. Currently, car has 165,xxx miles. As you can see, the two front (now rotated to rear) tires are bald! The other two tires have a normal amount of tread remaining however. I was running about 1° of camber front and rear, and explains why the inside is more worn, but doesn't explain the overall accelerated wear that occurred only on the fronts. I also have an alignment report showing only the front left Toe is out of spec (-0.39° measured vs. +/-0.08 spec).
In my opinion, this would fall under the warranty via excessive/premature tire wear, but of course I imagine any shop would fuss about the lack of rotation. To make matters worse, I purchased and installed these tires at Walmart, which I'm now learning isn't an authorized Kumho installer and Kumho's warranty form says they must be installed by an authorized installer. However, Walmart's own listing for the tires says it's covered by a 50k mile tread life warranty (see last photo).
Cons: premature wear, bald tires
Vehicle:
Subaru Outback
Mileage: 14000 km
I have about 21k miles on the stock dunlops that came with the car when I bought it. The tires are already balding and one tire has a leak.
Cons: balding, leak, poor durability
Vehicle:
Subaru
Mileage: 33796 km
Write your review about tires
Help others - share your experience with this part.
Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page
The brake discs Hella got the first review!
The brake hoses POWER STOP got the first review!
The ABS unit OEM FORD got the first review!
For wiper blades PIAA already 100 reviews.
For cabin filter Fram already 25 reviews.
In the rating best air filter already 5 brands participate!
In the rating best timing belt already 13 brands participate!
In the rating best head gasket already 3 brands participate!
In the auto rating shock absorbers for Ford Ranger already 20 brands participate!
In the auto rating headlights for Volkswagen Golf already 5 brands participate!
In the auto rating wiper blades for Ford Fusion already 10 brands participate!
For battery Deka already 50 reviews.
Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page
Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page
