Brake pads ATE or Zimmermann
For normal driving I'd recommend either ATE Ceramic pads, paired with ATE, painted or coated discs.
Get Ate ceramic. never (almost never) have to wash your wheels again
I replaced the Brembo with the Zimmermann myself, so far so good, the original Brembo brakes warped after less than 15.000 km, I have now another 15.000 km driven with the Zimmermann and they are as good as new.
Brakes and hoses ATE.
I just installed front and rear brakes @90k on my MK7.5 GTI w/PP brakes with a kit from FCP Euro Zimmerman cross drilled font and rear with EBC Red Stuff pads. The price has gone up a good bit since then but its a good upgrade from stock imo.
I also suggest you to buy ATE or TRW pads, because cheap stuff might squeak.
If you’ve still got UFO fronts the part number for pads is ATE 602847 (13.0460-2847.2)
Meiner Erfahrung nach bremst das genauso gut wie andere Bremsen, das Problem ist nach 10tkm sportlicher Fahrweise sind Bel\u00e4ge und Scheiben leer, normale Fahrweise max 20tkm. Felgen Kohlschwarz weil nat\u00fcrlich mega viel Bremsstaub in kurzer Zeit.
We use ATE here in Germany. Rear brake pads will probably require a diagnostic device to disengage the electrical parking brake.
Hatte mal teure ATE Bremsen die sofort verrostet sind. Nie wieder.
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.
Which brake pads to choose — ATE or Zimmermann?
If choosing brake pads across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.
We compare brake pads across these categories:
- PR Score.
- Overall ranking.
- Vote balance.
- Average rating.
- Number of reviews.
- Feature ratings.
- Car owners’ choice.
Which brake pads are better — Zimmermann or ATE?
In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads ATE were overall better than Zimmermann.
- ATE received a PR Score of 87 out of 100, and Zimmermann scored 85 points.
- ATE ranked 11 in the overall ranking, and Zimmermann ranked 28.
- The average rating is higher for ATE (4.2) than for Zimmermann (4).
-
Brake pads ATE have better feature ratings than Zimmermann:
- Noise - owners believe, that this property for ATE is better than Zimmermann.
- Braking - drivers claim, that this property for ATE is outperforms Zimmermann.
- Dust - reviews suggest, that this property for ATE is preferred to Zimmermann.
Which brake pads are more popular — ATE or Zimmermann?
In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads ATE were overall more popular than Zimmermann.
By vote balance, brake pads ATE surpassed Zimmermann:
- For ATE, the ratio of positive (154) to negative (22) votes is 132 votes.
- For Zimmermann, the ratio of positive (36) to negative (6) votes is 30 votes.
By number of reviews, brake pads ATE surpassed Zimmermann:
- For brake pads ATE there are 56 reviews: 46 positive, 8 neutral, 2 negative.
- For brake pads Zimmermann there are 14 reviews: 12 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative.
Which brake pads do car owners prefer — ATE or Zimmermann?
In March 2026, according to PartReview, brake pads ATE led more car-specific ratings than Zimmermann:
ATE are chosen by owners of cars such as: BMW M4, Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Polo, and others.
Brake pads Zimmermann have not yet taken leading positions in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding a review and specifying your car.
Other comparisons of brake pads
If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.
For example, comparisons of brake pads ATE with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Carbotech.
Also available: comparisons of brake pads Zimmermann with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Carbotech.
You can also see who is better among other brake pads manufacturers: EBC or POWER STOP, EBC or Akebono, EBC or Hawk Performance, Brembo or EBC, Akebono or POWER STOP.