Owner reviews for tires

Manufacturers

137

Reviews

15394

Best manufacturers by properties

Noise

Continental

4.0

Grip

MICHELIN

4.3

Ride comfort

MICHELIN

Manufacturers

Tires MICHELIN or Continental

Tires MICHELIN or Pirelli

Tires MICHELIN or Falken

Tires MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE

Tires MICHELIN or Goodyear

Tires MICHELIN or Nokia

Show all

Part:

Back

Manufacturer:

Back

Make:

Back

Model:

Back

Generation:

Review tone

Positive Negative Neutral

Reviews found: 0

Reviews

Relevant

New

Helpful

Goodyear › Tires

adrew 16 May 2013, 15:42

Rating 4.5

Grip:
Noise:
Ride comfort:

my Yaris came with H-rated Goodyear Assurance FuelMax tires. They aren't terribly sporty but the handling is competent, they're very quiet, ride well, do well in the wet and -- despite my best efforts -- seem to be very slow wearing. The car also gets 3-4 more MPG than our '11 Yaris which has an identical powertrain but normal tires (horrible Bridgestone RE92s).

Pros: competent handling, very quiet, ride well, slow wearing, good wet performance, improved fuel economy

Cons: not terribly sporty

Vehicle: Toyota Yaris

Hankook › Tires

todras 16 May 2013, 01:19

Rating 4.5

Grip:

Just got these for my commuter and love them. I know of others that purchased them and were really happy plus the rebate they have.

Pros: loved them, happy with purchase

Kumho › Tires

L33t A2 29 Apr 2013, 12:49

Rating 4.0

Grip:
Noise:

I ran those Kumhos on the Volvo 850 Turbo I had, I liked them a lot. The only downside was being that the car was heavy, you could feel the sidewall flex in hard cornering, then again they are a sport all season and not a true summer tire so I think they fit the bill nicely.

Pros: liked them a lot, fit the bill nicely

Cons: sidewall flex in hard cornering

Vehicle: Volvo 850

Kumho › Tires

vdub4lyf 29 Apr 2013, 09:59

Rating 4.5

Grip:
Ride comfort:

I like my Kumho's 205/45/16's, I have about 15,000 mi. on them, still alot of meat. There 2 yrs. old still looks new. They cost me $125 per tire.

Pros: good treadwear, looks new

Mileage: 24140 km

Falken › Tires

VoltronSBA 29 Apr 2013, 02:56

Rating 4.0

Grip:
Noise:

I love my Falkens. Pretty quiet, no hydroplaning and cheap! Pretty decent grip in wet and dry. Terrible in snow. And They seem to be a very soft rubber that wears a little quick.

Pros: pretty quiet, no hydroplaning, decent grip

Cons: terrible in snow, wears quick

MICHELIN › Tires

myquitacre 24 Apr 2013, 02:11

Rating 4.0

Grip:

look into lightweight battery (I run a Braille 21lbs in my Nismo) and tires...the Michelin Pilot SuperSports are pretty lightweight.

Pros: pretty lightweight

Continental › Tires

MVJ1975 11 Apr 2013, 22:21

Rating 5.0

Grip:

And yet another vote for the Conti DW. I run them on the FR-S and I'm very happy with them.

Pros: very happy with them

Vehicle: Subaru BRZ

GENERAL TIRE › Tires

BostonB6 11 Apr 2013, 21:30

Rating 5.0

Noise:

I had the General Altimax HP's on my X3 and they were a way better than the Conti's they replaced. Every set of Conti's I've ever had make way too much noise. :thumbup::thumbup: on the General's

Pros: way better (General)

Cons: too much noise (Continental)

Vehicle: BMW X3

NANKANG › Tires

GTI2Slow 1 Sep 2010, 00:51

Rating 3.0

Grip:
Ride comfort:

I got a set on some wheels I traded. I think NS7000 is on the sidewall. They are alright, they are round and black. I haven't had a flat and I go into the uber crappy Boston roads all the time, no bubbles no tread defects. They are just run of the mill budget tires. Would I get them again? Probably not. Can I find anything to complain about? Not really.

Pros: no flats, no bubbles, no defects

Cons: budget tires

DUNLOP › Tires

MidKnight1872 24 Jun 2010, 02:53

Rating 1.0

Grip:

I am not happy with the quality of the Dunlop tires and I feel they should replace all the tires with a better reinforced sidewall in order to avoid the problem from resurfacing.

Cons: bubbles on tires

Vehicle: Volkswagen