Love the 3.12s. They will chew thru your rotors tho
Pros: love them
Cons: chew through rotors
Owner reviews for brake pads
Manufacturers
Comparisons
I've used both I like the bite of the ferodo's better.
Pros: better bite
I have a friend with a near-identicle Zenki to mine, his is powered by a built single turbo rb26. He's making well in excess of 700whp and the z32s are plenty of brake for him as a point of reference.
Pros: plenty of brake for 700whp
Vehicle:
Nissan
My last set lasted me 60k miles before I could hear it was time to change. Those were the basic ones
Pros: long lasting
Cons: noise when worn
Vehicle:
Kia Sorento
Mileage: 96560 km
The textar pads are great for normal and slightly aggressive driving. The initial bite is great compared to ceramic pads, although they do dust a lot. To me the trade off is worth it for great pedal feel.
Pros: great initial bite, great pedal feel
Cons: dust a lot
Vehicle:
Audi S3
Powerstop carbon fiber/ceramic. Very little dust and no noise
Pros: very little dust
Cons: no noise
I switched to the Ferodo DSUno. I am satisfied with its performance, but they seem to struggle because of something. Today, after the track day on Saturday, I checked it and found a crack and a gnawed edge. Also, they have uneven wear, about 0.5-1mm difference. The differences are between the top and bottom parts of the pads, front and back parts and on different sides of the same rotor (inner and outer pads). Uneven wear was with the old pads as well. Recently, I installed brake air ducts, and after going out from the track, the temperature was, in the worst case, 480C degree, which looks fine for these pads. In total, I drove for about 3 hours on tracks, one on a wet track (so no hard braking) and two moderately/hard(8-9/10) braking. The brake rotors are also new, Zimmermann blank, installed with pads. The initial thickness of the pads is 16.4mm (with the plate, the plate is 5.5mm, so the "pure" pad is about 11mm) Currently, I have eaten about 4.5-5mm of the pads in 3 hours of tracking.
Pros: good performance, satisfied
Cons: uneven wear, cracked, gnawed edge
Vehicle:
Suzuki Swift
65k miles rav4 mine was down to 3mm which was in the red on the brake thickness gauge.
Cons: worn quickly
Vehicle:
Toyota
Mileage: 65000 km
I'm at 70k km and have changed only front braking pads so far. OEM braking pads and rotors suck. I've switched to EBC brakes brand based on the recs of my familiar Mazda owners and will never come back to the stock shit.
Pros: better than OEM
Cons: OEM pads suck
Mileage: 70000 km
Just changed a 4Runner with 80k miles, the pads were worn flat all the way down.
Cons: worn quickly
Vehicle:
Toyota 4runner
Mileage: 80000 km
Write your review about brake pads
Help others - share your experience with this part.
Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page
The brake discs FEBI got the first review!
The brake caliper OEM BMW got the first review!
The brake caliper FEBI got the first review!
For headlights OEM Volkswagen already 50 reviews.
In the rating best fuel pump already 5 brands participate!
In the rating best starter motor already 10 brands participate!
In the rating best air filter already 5 brands participate!
In the auto rating shock absorbers for Ford Ranger already 20 brands participate!
In the auto rating brake discs for Volkswagen Golf already 10 brands participate!
In the auto rating headlights for Volkswagen Golf already 5 brands participate!
For battery Deka already 50 reviews.
For wiper blades PIAA already 100 reviews.
Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page
Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page
